Showing posts with label cpac. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cpac. Show all posts
While several groups boycott the event, others are announcing their attendance and speaking engagements at CPAC. Herman Cain is the latest to announce that he'll speak at the conference. Great news to me...I've been paying attention to him since his awesome speech at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference last year.

CPAC 2011 will be held Febraury 10-12, 2011 in Washington, DC. Herman Cain will speak on Friday, February 11 at 4:30 p.m.
In a statement on air yesterday, Kevin McCollough said the American Family Association was not planning on skipping out on CPAC, regardless of GOProud's involvement. Today brings a different story.

AFA has sent a message to CPAC: "Homosexuality is not a conservative value." I'm not exactly sure what happened in the last 24 hours to change their mind - perhaps McCollough was just ahead of himself. Whatever the reason, they now join The American Principles Project, The National Organization for Marriage, Capitol Research Center, The Center for Military Readiness, Liberty Counsel, Liberty University, Family Research Council, and Concerned Women for America. Focus on the Family, who is co-sponsoring this year, may make it the last time they participate. According to SVP of Focus's CitizenLink Tom Minnery, CitizenLink is participating this year in part to offset GOProud’s presence at CPAC. “When you don’t have the influence of organizations like ours,” Minnery said, “you end up with influences from organizations like GOProud.”

I think any organizations choosing to boycott CPAC are doing themselves and their supporters a complete disservice. Running and hiding from every person or group with whom you disagree sends a bad message. Social conservatism is only one segment of the conservative landscape and abstaining from all discussions due to a difference in one issue is harmful to their movement as a whole, not to mention very 5th grade.
Over at the Washington Post, Jennifer Rubin has written a thoughtful opinion piece on social conservative groups boycotting CPAC in response to GOProud's involvement. She makes a couple good points, especially when she says what better place to discuss our differences as conservatives than at one of the largest conservative gathering in the nation.

Meanwhile, Kevin McCullough from The American Family Association (AFA) has announced AFA will not join itself to the list of other social conservative organizations boycotting CPAC. McCullough made a strong statement on why AFA will attend as well as what he thinks of those Christian groups who are participating in the boycott.

Having registered for the event with Campaign For Liberty, I'm looking forward to attending CPAC in February regardless of the hoopla over who's doing what to whom in their hotel room.
It is a new year but in the world of CPAC, it’s the same old same old. It seems that defending individual liberty and fiscal responsibility while also supporting a limited federal government is only considered “conservative” if you’re not a gay organization. Just like last year, when gay Republican group GOProud signed on as one of CPAC’s many sponsors, talk of boycotting the largest conservative conference was threatened from social conservatives. This year, at least two large social conservative groups have publicly announced their boycott of February’s Conservative Political Action Conference over GOPRoud’s involvement as a "participating organization.”

WorldNetDaily ran a piece stating that Family Research Council and Concerned Women for America are among other groups adding their names to the list of boycotters. The problem these conservative groups have with GOProud’s involvement is the notion that it necessarily sends the message that “moral opposition to homosexuality is no longer welcome in the conservative movement.” That sounds like a half-baked and illogical conclusion to me because I recognize that no group (political, racial or otherwise) is a monolith. What GOProud’s involvement really says is that conservative thinkers come from all walks of life and though we may disagree on how some people live their lives, they have the right to live them free of government intervention. That’s the type of conservative message I would expect from the nation’s largest conservative gathering.

I don’t deny an organization’s right to boycott any event they choose for any reason they’ve chosen but I will point out what I think is total hypocrisy of their so-called “conservative values.” Nobody forces attendees to go to specific speaking events during CPAC and nobody would force FRC or CWA to approve of, support or otherwise engage with GOProud if they chose not to. Shutting any conservative group out of a conservative convention because they fail to conform to another’s idea of what conservative is would be wrong. GOProud rarely jumps on the “homosexual agenda” bandwagon and, even more telling of the organization’s endorsements and positions, is often blasted by the gay community on the left. I don’t always agree with them but GOProud definitely has a strong record of conservatism. In fact, with regard to fiscal matters and foreign policy GOProud probably stands on the same side as FRC and CWA.

The way I see it, any conservative group boycotting a conservative conference because gay conservatives will be there is a group I can do without anyway. I'm interested in a conservative movement that is more concerned with what's going on in government rather than in another conservative's bedroom.

What do you think? Should conservative groups boycott CPAC or are they making a big deal out of nothing?